Services
AI Engineering
AI built into the platforms, operating model and products you already run.
Explore AI EngineeringCloud Development
Scalable, secure cloud solutions on AWS, Google Cloud and Azure.
Explore Cloud DevelopmentDevOps as a Service
CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure automation and reliability engineering.
Explore DevOps as a ServiceTransformation
Process automation, system integration and change management, to drive growth and efficiency.
Explore TransformationBig Data & Analytics
Data pipelines, warehousing and business intelligence.
Explore Big Data & AnalyticsMobile Development
iOS and Android apps, built with React Native and Flutter.
Explore Mobile DevelopmentUX/UI Design
Research-driven design that delights users and drives business results.
Explore UX/UI DesignArchitect / Rule / Create
Our AI-native software factory. It changes how software is specified, built, tested and delivered — agents doing the work, engineering governance holding the line. Where we are heading, it also changes how you pay: per usage or per outcome, not per hour.
ARC is the order the work happens in, and the reason the output holds. Design the solution first, decide who controls what, then build it with everything pointed at that design. Skip the first and agents produce something confident and wrong; skip the second and nobody can say who signed it.
Design the solution before anything is built. Twenty years of delivery goes in here — what the system has to do, how it fits the estate around it, where it will be put under load, and what would make it wrong. This is the part agents cannot originate, and the part that decides everything after it.
Set the governance the build runs under: what agents may touch, which decisions need a signature, what gets logged, and how a bad change is rolled back. Control sits where the project needs it — direct human, agentic, or hybrid — and is chosen deliberately rather than inherited by accident.
Put the resources in and build what was architected, under the rules that were set. Requests, context, specifications and agents all point at one design, so throughput scales without the result drifting from the thing that was agreed.
The five-step production line below is how those three are actually run: architecture becomes intent and specification, the rules become the gate, and creation is the part agents do at volume.
Most delivery time is not spent writing code. It goes into deciding what should exist, keeping that decision consistent as it moves through a team, and proving it still holds once it reaches production. Agents changed the cost of typing. They did not change the cost of deciding — so ARC industrialises the part that actually takes the time.
Agentic development is not a chat window. It is a production line with checkpoints, and humans appear exactly where judgment is required: at the start, when intent is set, and at the gate, before anything ships.
You describe what the software should do — in plain language, a document, or a call. No tickets, no spec template to fill in.
Intent is compiled into something testable: requirements, interfaces, architecture and acceptance criteria you can argue with before a line is written.
Agents build, test and review against that specification, iterating until every acceptance criterion passes.
Checks run at the gate — by an engineer, by agents, or by both, depending on what the project demands. What does not vary is the signature: a named senior engineer is accountable for what ships.
It deploys, and ARC keeps it alive — patched, monitored, and evolving as the intent changes.
Intent is always human and production is always agentic. Verification sits between them — engineer, agents, or both, decided per project. That the gate exists at all is the product; it is what separates a factory from a code generator.
An agentic build is only usable inside a real company if it can survive the same scrutiny everything else does. These six are what ARC is engineered against — they shape the gates, the logging, the access model and what an agent is allowed to touch.
These describe how ARC is built and the controls it ships with. Where a standard requires independent certification, that is stated per engagement rather than claimed here.
ARC is one product inside East Wolf, not the company. It earns its way outward: our delivery first, then a small batch of teams, then anyone who wants to run the same operating model.
This is the business model we are building ARC toward: we charge only per usage or per outcome. Once agents do the production work, hours stop being the real cost of software, so they should stop being what you pay for. That could make projects a lot cheaper, and give you far more for what you spend than the models it replaces.
You pay for what you run.
You pay for an agreed result.
This is a direction, not today's price list. Work we take on now still runs on our current engagement models, and the rates and terms for per usage and per outcome are not set yet.
See current pricingNot a public beta, and not a waitlist we forget about. We take on a handful of teams at a time, because each one gets a senior engineer watching how ARC behaves on their real work — and that attention does not scale to a large cohort.
Access to ARC on one real project of yours.
A senior engineer alongside you for the whole run.
The governance layer — gates, audit trail, rollback.
Direct influence on what we build next.
If the fit is not right yet we will say so, rather than park you in a queue indefinitely.
We open ARC to a small batch at a time. Tell us what you would build and we will come back to you directly.